9 min read
mood: educational
🌈
Beyond the Binary
Here's a question that might surprise you: not everyone with visible differences considers themselves disabled. And that's not denial or internalized ableism it's a reflection of how complex and nuanced the disability experience actually is.
Understanding why requires us to move beyond binary thinking about ability and disability, and recognize that human difference exists on a spectrum that defies simple categorization.
Understanding why requires us to move beyond binary thinking about ability and disability, and recognize that human difference exists on a spectrum that defies simple categorization.
⚖️ Breaking Down the Binary
⚖️
Breaking Down the Binary
When most people think about disability, they envision clear-cut categories: you either are disabled or you aren't. You either need a wheelchair or you don't. You either can work or you can't. But real life is messier than that, and the disability experience encompasses a huge range of different challenges, needs, and identities.
Consider these scenarios:
- Someone born with a cleft lip who's had corrective surgery and functions without daily accommodations
- A person with ADHD who excels in their career but struggles with executive function
- Someone with a chronic illness who has good days and bad days
- A person with a learning difference who's found successful workarounds
Are these people disabled? The answer isn't straightforward, and it doesn't need to be.
Consider these scenarios:
- Someone born with a cleft lip who's had corrective surgery and functions without daily accommodations
- A person with ADHD who excels in their career but struggles with executive function
- Someone with a chronic illness who has good days and bad days
- A person with a learning difference who's found successful workarounds
Are these people disabled? The answer isn't straightforward, and it doesn't need to be.
🏥 The Social vs. Medical Models
🏥
The Social vs. Medical Models
How someone views their own disability status often depends on which model of disability resonates with their experience. The medical model focuses on individual impairments and limitations what's "wrong" with your body or mind that needs to be fixed. The social model emphasizes how society creates barriers for people with differences the problem isn't your body, it's stairs without ramps, workplaces without accommodations, or social attitudes that exclude.
Someone whose differences have been largely addressed through medical intervention might not feel disabled in their daily life. Someone who faces significant social barriers because of their appearance might strongly identify as disabled. Both perspectives are valid.
Someone whose differences have been largely addressed through medical intervention might not feel disabled in their daily life. Someone who faces significant social barriers because of their appearance might strongly identify as disabled. Both perspectives are valid.
🛠️ The Accommodation Factor
🛠️
The Accommodation Factor
One way people often gauge disability status is through need for accommodations. But this creates a tricky situation: some people who could benefit from accommodations don't request them (due to stigma, lack of awareness, or fear of being seen as "needy"), while others have found ways to succeed without formal accommodations.
I know people with cleft lip and palate who've never requested workplace accommodations and wouldn't consider themselves disabled. I also know people with the same condition who require flexible scheduling for medical appointments, prefer certain seating arrangements, or need understanding about speech patterns and who do identify as disabled.
Neither approach is wrong; they reflect different experiences of the same condition.
I know people with cleft lip and palate who've never requested workplace accommodations and wouldn't consider themselves disabled. I also know people with the same condition who require flexible scheduling for medical appointments, prefer certain seating arrangements, or need understanding about speech patterns and who do identify as disabled.
Neither approach is wrong; they reflect different experiences of the same condition.
🎭 The Passing Privilege Complication
🎭
The Passing Privilege Complication
Some people with disabilities can "pass" as non-disabled in many situations. This passing privilege can make the disability identity feel less relevant to their daily experience, even though they may still face barriers or challenges related to their condition.
For example, someone with a cleft lip might not be immediately identifiable as disabled, especially after surgical repair. They might not face the same systemic barriers as someone who uses a wheelchair, but they still navigate medical appointments, potential speech differences, and social reactions to their appearance.
This passing privilege can create a complex relationship with disability identity grateful for the access it provides while also feeling disconnected from disability community and support.
For example, someone with a cleft lip might not be immediately identifiable as disabled, especially after surgical repair. They might not face the same systemic barriers as someone who uses a wheelchair, but they still navigate medical appointments, potential speech differences, and social reactions to their appearance.
This passing privilege can create a complex relationship with disability identity grateful for the access it provides while also feeling disconnected from disability community and support.
📊 The Severity Spectrum
📊
The Severity Spectrum
Disability exists on a spectrum of severity and impact. Some people need 24/7 care; others need occasional medical support. Some face daily barriers; others encounter obstacles primarily in specific situations. The severity of impact doesn't make someone "more" or "less" disabled, but it does affect how they experience and identify with disability.
Someone whose cleft was repaired early with excellent results might have minimal ongoing impact on their daily life. Someone with more complex cleft-related challenges might need ongoing speech therapy, dental work, and social support. Both experiences are valid, and both people get to decide how they identify.
Someone whose cleft was repaired early with excellent results might have minimal ongoing impact on their daily life. Someone with more complex cleft-related challenges might need ongoing speech therapy, dental work, and social support. Both experiences are valid, and both people get to decide how they identify.
🌍 Cultural and Generational Factors
🌍
Cultural and Generational Factors
How someone relates to disability identity can also be influenced by cultural background, generational differences, and family attitudes. Some cultures view visible differences as simply part of human diversity rather than as disabilities. Some generations were raised with "overcome and achieve" messaging that conflicts with disability pride movements.
These factors shape how comfortable someone feels claiming disabled identity and whether it feels empowering or limiting to them.
These factors shape how comfortable someone feels claiming disabled identity and whether it feels empowering or limiting to them.
⚖️ The Rights and Resources Question
⚖️
The Rights and Resources Question
Here's a practical consideration: in many systems, accessing certain rights, accommodations, or resources requires identifying as disabled. This creates a situation where someone might not personally identify as disabled but still need to claim that identity for legal or practical purposes.
The Americans with Disabilities Act covers many conditions that people don't think of as disabilities in their daily lives. Someone might use ADA protections for workplace accommodations while not considering disability a central part of their identity.
The Americans with Disabilities Act covers many conditions that people don't think of as disabilities in their daily lives. Someone might use ADA protections for workplace accommodations while not considering disability a central part of their identity.
💡
Why This Matters
Understanding the spectrum nature of disability is important for several reasons:
Inclusion: When we acknowledge that disability identity is complex and personal, we create more inclusive spaces that welcome different experiences and perspectives.
Advocacy: Effective disability advocacy requires understanding the full range of experiences, not just the most visible or severe ones.
Support: People struggling with disability identity need space to explore what feels authentic to them without pressure to choose a side.
Policy: Better policies recognize the spectrum of disability experience rather than creating artificial barriers between "disabled enough" and "not disabled enough."
Inclusion: When we acknowledge that disability identity is complex and personal, we create more inclusive spaces that welcome different experiences and perspectives.
Advocacy: Effective disability advocacy requires understanding the full range of experiences, not just the most visible or severe ones.
Support: People struggling with disability identity need space to explore what feels authentic to them without pressure to choose a side.
Policy: Better policies recognize the spectrum of disability experience rather than creating artificial barriers between "disabled enough" and "not disabled enough."
""Moving Beyond Labels
Maybe the goal isn't to determine who is or isn't disabled, but to create a world that accommodates human diversity in all its forms. Maybe we need multiple ways to talk about difference, challenge, and need that don't all require the same label.
Some people with visible differences will always identify strongly as disabled. Others will see their differences as simply part of who they are without feeling connected to disability identity. Still others will move fluidly between these perspectives depending on context and life stage.
All of these approaches are valid. The disability spectrum is wide enough to include people with very different experiences, needs, and identities. What matters isn't where exactly someone falls on that spectrum, but that we create space for the full range of human difference and the complex ways people understand their own experiences.
The Bottom Line
Disability isn't black and white it's every shade of gray in between. Someone can have a visible difference without identifying as disabled, just as someone can have an invisible disability that significantly impacts their life. Both experiences deserve understanding, support, and respect.
The goal isn't to convince everyone with differences to identify as disabled, or to gatekeep who gets to claim that identity. The goal is to create a world where everyone can access the support they need and live authentically, regardless of how they understand their own experience.
Because at the end of the day, the spectrum of human ability and difference is beautiful in its complexity and trying to force it into simple categories does a disservice to everyone involved.